And once again I have summoned all my energy so that what ever is stuck in my brains for ages will come out!! This is a desperate attempt to shed some weight as I have always believed, its just all the thoughts which have been occupying my cerebral make me look slightly over weight!! But there are very few moments where the locked matter crawls out and then I am compelled to post it. I am still trying hard to fathom which exact force does that.
Anyways, to the business!!! We have always been taught that there are four pillars of the democracy- the judiciary, the legislature, the executive and the press (and now whole lot of media included). While the 2nd and the 3rd pillars try hard to collapse every time, 1st and 4th pillars which have always kept the edifice of the democracy erect – albeit until recently.
The Press was largely limited to print media i.e. newspapers, magazines and other publications. However, the advent of electronic media has changed the rules of the game dramatically. And by very nature the impact of this media is transient. So in a bid to create an impact, sensationalism remains the only successful (!) mantra.
The sensationalism of electronic media has different aspect to it. The different tricks pulled out of a hat are more than even a great magician can ever conjure up. So right from flashing any damn news as a breaking news to their SMS polls on any news, one can go on and on and on. But I wish to carry out an inquisition into the gravest of them all- Trials by media.
Each night and on every news channel, there is a similar scene. A judge sitting confidently, sometimes with a touch of arrogance of know-all, with a chargesheet and the investigation report. (A dual and confused role of a policeman and a judge) A panel of experts including political spokespersons if the charge is a political. And at the bottom of TV screen are the constant updates of opinions of Indian people (!).
I am myself an avid follower of this kind of debates which are turning into quasi-judicial proceedings very fast. But in recent months some of the anchors have quite seriously assumed the role of a judge. And frankly they are all too serious for anyone’s comfort and well being. My basic problem with these people is that they come with an agenda every time. Eg when the court ordered the filing of the chargesheet against Rajesh-Nupur Talwar, a chief editor of a popular English news channel was almost hysterical. His team carried on their own investigations. They are tabling all the crucial evidences live on TV and the panelists involved were giving their verdict within that one hour debate!!! Now in the same case, a rival news channel interviewed the Talwar couple and the tone of the debate was to completely exonerate the couple of all the charges.
Another high profile case was of Mr. Binayak Sen-convicted on charges of sedition; when the verdict was announced against him almost the entire media was against the judgement. It was a case of mass bashing of the Court- the kind of bashing normally is enjoyed by our beloved governments. And even worse and shameful is inviting public opinions through the SMS polls. A commoner on the streets is hardly aware about the nuances, technicalities and detailed procedures that are associated with any judicial proceeding. An animated and in some cases hysterical presenter puts some facts and pieces of investigations to solicit an opinion. If this is not the contempt of the Courts then what is it? There is a very thin line of difference between criticizing the Courts and making a complete mockery of the Court proceedings. And with these kinds of debates on the Court’s verdict, it is definitely an attempt to take the legal proceedings to a completely inappropriate level.
And yet another shocking example- Mi Nathuram Godase Bolatoy- a controversial drama based on Nathuram Godase was cleared by the High Court but even then NCP disrupted its show in Thane. And on top of that makers of the Drama and a NCP leader were debating in the newsroom about the merits of the drama. And at the end of the show they reached an agreement where producer was ready to listen to objections of NCP to the script!! And that’s it my Lord!!
The sanctity of our democracy is in the hands of our Courts. There are times when the same media has taken an aggressive stand against the judiciary and it is lauded by the judiciary itself (Jessica Lall case). But these cases are far and few in between. Because, a TV presenter carrying an overt bias and prejudice cannot be and should not be expected to carry out any viable and constructive debate.
In the times when general public is full of cynicism towards the politicians and the governments, the sanctity of the judiciary has to be preserved and respected. Those with the means to influence public perceptions should not get themselves embroiled in frivolous battles of TRPs. And if the edifice of the democracy should always stand tall then all the pillars should give each other strength and keep on fortifying the foundations.
-N. D. K. Nikhil