90:10 Quota: Justice finally!!!!!!
Quotas always invite some controversies…….it just matters which side of the coin you are watching.
When Government announced 90:10 quota in FYJC admissions it was regarded as populist announcement, with the elections in next few months, it is claimed Maharashtra Government is trying to woo “Marathi” voters!
So, our discussion point is how far this quota is fair? I am an avid advocate of quotas in all their forms except employment and higher education. The quota of 90:10 is definitely fair.
Why-
- The interests of the in-house students should always come first.
- This reservation is not parochial; why not take admission in Non-Maharashtra Board even for higher education?
- The examination pattern is definitely tilted in CBSE/ICSE students’ favour.
- Lenient checking of Non-SSC Boards against stricter checking of SSC Board.
- Best of 5 gives unjustified edge to Non-SSC students.
- SSC Board students face 3 language papers against 2 for Non-SSC Board.
- When parents are willing to pay lacs of rupees on schooling then what stops them in sending their children in Non-SSC colleges?
- If the standard of SSC is poor, then at college level why would anyone prefer Maharashtra Board over Non-Maharashtra Board?
The reasons above represent prima-facie case of SSC students.
But, the reason my attention was drawn on this issue as 26/11 war hero- a Maharashtrian signed petition against the quota. In a comment, a principal said during 26/11 no one thought of being Maharashtrian and Non-Maharashtrian. Now, I think this is all misunderstanding and misquoting the facts. Is it that Maharashtra Government is forcing Non-SSC Board schools to forcibly admit SSC students-“No”. The only reason I can see here is that in-house students, now that means either from vernacular medium or not, should be assured of their seats. Is it that Maharashtra Government has tried to help only vernacular medium students?-“NO”. So where is the question of being Maharashtrian or not?
Even the proportion of 90:10 is more than balanced. There are over 15 lac SSC students against merely 15 thousand of Non-SSC Board. So where is the injustice? One thing I agree, the Government should have declared the decision much earlier to avoid unnecessary burden to students, as a result now they will be dragged in unnecessary delay.
I am strongly in favour of 90:10 quota system. Those who do not agree should better find colleges outside Maharashtra to please their own better standard.
My heartiest congratulations to all those who have successfully cleared Board Examinations (irrespective of their Boards)!!!!
NB: IIT had to keep aside more than 1000 reserved seats, as the students are not good enough!! Well, we can argue both sides here. But, isn’t it a national waste and national tragedy? All these seats could have benefited needed and talented youth of our country.
Links:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-4694288.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Pune/10-quota-may-suffice-for-non-SSC-students/articleshow/4698910.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-4698957.cms